Legal Opinion
Beggs v. James Hanley Brewing Company
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided November 22, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Assumpsit, the facts being stated in the opinion. Heard on plaintiff’s petition for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The plaintiff delivered and installed in the defendant’s brewery certain grates and blowers on the contract made by the following proposition and acceptance:
“New York, May 25, 1903.
“ James Hanley Brewing Co.,
“33 Jackson St., Providence, R. I.
“ Gentlemen : — We have received communication from Mr. D. N. Rothermel stating that you desire a proposition for the installation of the McClave apparatus under your three boilers. We have also received communication from our Mr. Reyhner giving us definite furnace measurements, and we herewith submit you proposition for the above installation: We will…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
3Cited by2 opinions
- Drumar Mining Co. v. Morris Ravine Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Lepore v. FuscellaroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1948