Benhamo v. Marinelli
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by tendering evidence in admissible form that the defendants Joseph Marinelli and Monique Marinelli (hereinafter together the sellers) were ready, willing, and able to perform their obligations pursuant to a contract for the sale of the subject real property on the law day, and that the plaintiff failed to appear and proceed with the closing (see Stenda Realty, LLC v Kornman, 67 AD3d 996, 998 [2009]; Pinhas v Comperchio, 50 AD3d 1117 [2008]). In opposition to the defendants’ motion, the plaintiff failed to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zeitoune v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Kaygreen Realty Co. v. IG Second Generation Partners, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Hegner v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Madison Equities, LLC v. MZ Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Pinhas v. ComperchioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ravina v. Hsing Hsung ChuangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Latipac Corp. v. BHM Realty LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- 111-38 Management Corp. v. BenitezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- 111-38 Management Corp. v. BenitezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Finkelstein v. LyndaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.