Harnishfager v. Independent Travel Agencies of America, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm an order denying Appellant’s motion to quash service of process. The trial court’s order is without prejudice to Appellant’s right to refile his motion at such time as there is evidence of attempted or purported service upon him individually. At this time Appellant’s motion to quash is premature as, to date, the only indication in the record concerning service is the service upon a codefendant corporation. There is no evidence of any claim of service upon Appellant individually.
STONE, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Mungin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Braggs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Mosely v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- State v. BradyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Allen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.