Legal Opinion

Harnishfager v. Independent Travel Agencies of America, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 15, 1995No. 94-2977PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm an order denying Appellant’s motion to quash service of process. The trial court’s order is without prejudice to Appellant’s right to refile his motion at such time as there is evidence of attempted or purported service upon him individually. At this time Appellant’s motion to quash is premature as, to date, the only indication in the record concerning service is the service upon a codefendant corporation. There is no evidence of any claim of service upon Appellant individually.

STONE, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mungin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Braggs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Mosely v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. State v. BradyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Allen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API