Legal Opinion
Fraser and Wise, PC v. Primarily Primates, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 9, 1996No. Civ.A.94-10097-RCLPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LINDSAY, District Judge.
Recommendation Accepted. Objections filed by the plaintiff have not been considered because they were not timely filed.
ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION
Motion for Reconsideration is allowed. On reconsideration, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation for the Magistrate Judge on the merits.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COURTS I (BREACH OF CONTRACT), II (ACCOUNT ANNEXED), III (WORK), AND V (QUANTUM MERUIT) (DOCKET ENTRY #72)
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER THAT NO MATERIAL FACTS ARE IN DISPUTE WITH REGARD TO…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Maldonado-Denis v. Castillo-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Pablo Escoboza VegaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Gene Autrey Adams v. Paul MetivaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Grace United Methodist Church v. City of CheyenneDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2002
- Adelson v. HananelDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- Echavarria v. RoachDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Ex Parte KelleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte KelleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.