Legal Opinion

Rose v. Travelers Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 18, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitration award which granted petitioner the sum of $95,000 in uninsured motorist benefits, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Bambrick, J.), dated January 3, 1983, confirming said award. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, application to confirm the arbitration award denied, award vacated and matter remitted to the arbitrators for a new hearing consistent herewith. Upon compulsory arbitration of petitioner’s claim for uninsured motorist benefits, the arbitration panel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mount St. Mary's Hospital v. CatherwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. In Re the Arbitration Between Furstenberg & Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Motors Sales Corp. v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. In re the Arbitration between Fernandez & Universal Underwriters InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Rose v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Scher v. State Farm InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API