Legal Opinion

Sachleben v. Wolfe

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Leboy B. Valliant, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBond, J.

This is a suit for $10,000 for royalty alleged to be due the plaintiffs, who are parties of the first part, in the following contract:

“This agreement, made and entered into this twenty-third day of May, 1887, by and between Henry Sachleben and Louis J. Crecelius, of the city of St. Louis, Missouri, parties of the first part, and Daniel R. Wolfe, Charles S. Hale and Charles E. Heintze and their associates, of the same place, or such company as they may hereafter organize, parties of the second part, zvitnesseth as follows-:
*29“That said parties of the first part, who are now the owners of United…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conservative Realty Co. v. St. Louis Brewing Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Patterson v. Missouri Glass Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. St. Louis Trust Co. v. YorkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API