Legal Opinion

Ex parte Homann

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1989No. 3-89-106-CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POWERS, Justice.

On application for writ of habeas corpus filed by John Robert Homann, we review his claim that the trial court erred in overruling a plea of double jeopardy interposed by Homann in the State’s felony prosecution against him for an alleged misappropriation of construction-trust funds. Tex. Prop.Code Ann. § 162.001 et seq. (1984). Believing the record shows no error, we will deny the relief requested.

THE CONTROVERSY

A jury was chosen and sworn September 19, 1988. On the trial court’s instruction, the proceedings recessed until 9:30 o’clock the following morning. At the appointed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ex Parte RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  4. Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Ex Parte McAfeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ledesma v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Dale Raymond Crunk v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  3. Dale Raymond Crunk v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  4. Walter James Tubbs v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1993
  5. in Re Vaughn Birdwell, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API