In re Gold
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by the Second Judicial Department in December, 1950. In this proceeding brought by the Co-ordinating Committee on Discipline of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, New York County Lawyers’ Association and the Bronx County Bar Association, he is charged with eight specifications of professional misconduct, as hereinafter referred to. The Referee, to whom the matter was referred for the taking of testimony and the rendering of a report, has found that all the charges were duly sustained with the exception that he found Charge No. 6 sustained…
2Cited by1 opinion
- In re GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981