Legal Opinion

Vanderkodde v. Mary Jane M. Elliott, P.C.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided May 15, 2018No. 1:17–cv–203PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul L. Maloney, United States District Judge

Plaintiffs accuse Defendants of violating the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act. There is a pending motion for class certification. But, the injuries alleged by Plaintiffs arise from orders issued by state courts. And, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider claims that are functionally appeals of state court decisions.

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit were defendants in debt-collection lawsuits filed in state courts. In each state-court case, a *838judgment entered, which granted the state-court plaintiff prejudgment interest at a rate of 13%.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Rmi Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daniel VanderKodde v. Mary Jane M. Elliott, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Packard v. Equifax Information Services, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
  3. Smith v. Equifax Information Services, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API