Legal Opinion

Geisinger v. Conners

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 20, 1912No. 18,918PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; E. K. Skinner, Judge. Action by Charles Geisinger against Arsena Conners, his wife. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtProyosty, J.

This is a suit by husband against wife for separation from bed and *923board on the ground that the wife has abandoned the matrimonial domicile and refuses to return thereto, or, more properly, that the newly wed wife refuses to come and live in the matrimonial domicile.

After two of the three summons to return to the matrimonial domicile, which article 125 of the Code requires to be served upon the defendant in suits like the present, had been served upon the defendant wife, she filed an answer, in which she denied that plaintiff had ever provided a matrimonial domicile.

After issue had thus been…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cormier v. CormierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. Artigues v. ArtiguesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  3. Verret v. KoelmelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  4. Bonvillion v. PapaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  5. Doucet v. DoucetLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API