Legal Opinion

State v. Lyon

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 2, 1971No. 134-70PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Martin, Supr. J.. This is a petition for a writ of certiorari, requesting this Court to declare proceedings of the District Court of Vermont, Unit No.- 1, Rutland Circuit, illegal in connection with a summary hearing held under the so-called “implied consent law” as-provided by Section 4, of No. 212 of the Acts of 1959. (See Amendment, 1969, No. 267 (Adj. Sess.)' Section 5, 23 V.S.A. § 1205') Since no right of appellate review ‘is provided,- a petition for a writ' of certiorari is ah appropriate remedy to review questions of law arising in the course of such' a summary hearing. State v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davidson v. WhitehillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  2. State v. LaplacaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PineauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  2. Duncan v. Safety Responsibility Unit, Department of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Miner v. DISTRICT COURT OF VERMONT, ETC.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  4. Miner v. DISTRICT COURT OF VERMONT, ETC.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  5. Miner v. DISTRICT COURT OF VERMONT, ETC.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API