Legal Opinion

Daugherty v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 8, 1948No. 24195PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is an assault with intent to murder. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of three years.

We find in the transcript an instrument denominated “Defendant’s Bills of Exceptions.” The same character of instrument appears in Raymond Daugherty v. State, No. 24,194, this day decided. (152 Crim. Rep. 590). For complete discussion of the question raised thereby reference is made to said opinion.

Appellant addressed a number of objections to the court’s charge. We have examined the charge in the light of the objections addressed thereto…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ammann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Basquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harper v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  2. Windham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. Blount v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Blount v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API