Legal Opinion
Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated v. Kurt L. Schmoke, in His Official Capacity as Mayor of Baltimore City Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City City Council of Baltimore City David Tanner, in His Official Capacity as the General Superintendent of Zoning Administration and Enforcement, and John Joseph Curran, Attorney General of the State of Maryland, in His Official Capacity, the Association of National Advertisers, Incorporated the American Association of Advertising Agencies the Media Institute National Association of Broadcasters the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression Washington Legal Foundation Center for Science in the Public Interest Coalition for Beautiful Neighborhoods Baltimore City Wide Liquor Coalition for Better Laws and Regulations, Amici Curiae. Penn Advertising of Baltimore, Incorporated v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, a Municipal Corporation, and John Joseph Curran, Attorney General of the State of Maryland, in His Official Capacity, the Association of National Advertisers, Incorporated the American Association of Advertising Agencies the Media Institute National Association of Broadcasters the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression Washington Legal Foundation Center for Science in the Public Interest Coalition for Beautiful Neighborhoods Baltimore City Wide Liquor Coalition for Better Laws and Regulations, Amici Curiae
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 13, 1996No. 94-1431PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
101 F.3d 325
65 USLW 2340, 24 Media L. Rep. 2491
ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Kurt L. SCHMOKE, in his official capacity as Mayor of
Baltimore City; Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City;
City Council of Baltimore City; David Tanner, in his
official capacity as the General Superintendent of Zoning
Administration and Enforcement, Defendants-Appellees,
and
John Joseph Curran, Attorney General of the State of
Maryland, in his official capacity, Defendant.
The Association of National Advertisers, Incorporated; The
American Association of Advertising Agencies; The Media
Institute;…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Arms v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015