City of San Antonio v. Ruble
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
The question presented by this case is whether the City of San Antonio acquired two easements in its condemnation proceedings against the San Antonio River Authority or whether the easements had been abandoned. The courts below have held that the City did not acquire the easements. Tex.Civ.App., 443 S.W.2d 894. We reverse that part of the judgment and render judgment for the City. We affirm that part of the judgment of the court of civil appeals that the City owned the dams themselves.
The opinion of the court of civil appeals fully states the facts, and we shall state them only…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Saint Peter's Church v. BragawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- City of Anson v. ArnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- City of San Antonio v. Congregation of the Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate WordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Hamman v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Mondale v. Independent School District No. 31Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Phillips Natural Gas Co. v. Cardiff, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- City of Houston v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- City of Houston v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- City of San Antonio v. RubleTexas Supreme Court · 1970