Legal Opinion

Schuyler v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 4, 2006No. 95,482PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.:

Leo F. Schuyler, an inmate at the El Dorado Correctional Facility (EDCF), sought habeas corpus relief from the district court when prison officials classified him as a sex offender. Schuyler was so classified because he was once charged with aggravated sexual batteiy, a charge that was later dismissed by the State. The district court summarily denied Schuyler’s petition ruling that this was a matter of internal prison management and was therefore best left to “the professional staff.”

Further inquiry is needed here. Employing a “stigma plus” standard, as adopted by the Tenth Circuit…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Neal v. ShimodaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Jensen v. Redevelopment Agency of Sandy CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schuyler v. RobertsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. R. Davis, Jr. v. PA DOCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API