Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Billings v. Herold

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1956No. 9521Published

1Dissent

MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN:

(dissenting).

I think the judgment of the district court should be affirmed.

The question presented is one of statutory construction. The majority opinion on this point is double barreled. It holds, first, *155that the city never had the authority or power to pass an ordinance prohibiting the driving of an automobile on its streets by one under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and, second, if it ever had the power it had been taken away.

I concede that if either of these propositions is sound then the conclusion reached by my associates is correct. In my opinion, however,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Clayton v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Clayton v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Brooks v. CookMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. City of Helena v. KentMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State v. PoynterIdaho Supreme Court · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API