Legal Opinion

Earl Dean v. James Mozingo

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 27, 2012No. 11-60650UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

For the third time, we address the merits of this appeal. Earl Stephen Dean appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claims against the Mississippi Board of Bar Admissions. The district court held that Dean is not entitled to relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, because his claims are barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel. Because the district court committed no reversible error, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court, based on its well-reasoned opinion.

I

Because we have already recounted the facts and much of the procedural history of this case in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Harrison v. Chandler-Sampson Ins., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re DeanMississippi Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pie Development v. Pie Carr HoldingsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API