State v. Calkins

After the first witness on behalf of the state had been asked, and had answered, numerous questions, the de*25fendant objected to “the introduction of any evidence * * * for the reason that the transcript of the justice of the peace upon which this proceeding is and must'be based contained no judgment of the said justice to the effect or containing a finding that the crime had been committed, or that there is probable cause to believe Israel Calkins, the defendant in this case, guilty thereof.” The objection was properly overruled. It came too late. An objection to the introduction of any…