Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Dioguardi v. Warden of Rikers Island Penitentiary

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1975PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMax Bloom, J.

This proceeding was originally brought on by habeas writ. Inasmuch as its purpose was to review the result of relator’s "screening” by the Furlough Program Selection Committee, the court held that the matter was properly reviewable in an article 78 proceeding. It directed that the appropriate petition and answer be submitted so that the issues would be sufficiently defined to enable a determination on the merits (People ex rel. Cavalluzzo v Warden, 39 AD2d 897; People ex rel. Cromwell v Warden, 74 Misc 2d 642, 650). This has now been done.

There is no dispute with respect to the material…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Mc ColloughNew York Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API