Legal Opinion

Powell v. Page

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Christine A. Sproat, J.

*989Ordered that: (1) the Dutchess County District Attorney’s motion to intervene is granted, there being no opposition, and (2) petitioners’ motion is denied and the petition is dismissed.

In the instant CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioners seek to compel respondent Roland R. Page, Town Justice of the Town of Red Hook, to grant unconditional adjournments in contemplation of dismissal which had been offered by the Dutchess County District Attorney’s Office.

Initially, the court notes that this proceeding is rendered moot with respect to petitioners…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith-Hunter v. HarveyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Hollender v. Trump Village Cooperative, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. RickertNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. RuggieriPoughkeepsie City Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API