Berrio Callejas v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CYR, Senior Circuit Judge.
Like many before it, this appeal involves various violations of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c) & (d). 1 Nevertheless, appellant has not demonstrated a total failure to comply with a “core” Rule 11 concern and, after assessing the errors committed by the district court, we are satisfied that they are harmless or, in one instance, conspicuously waived on this appeal. See, e.g., United States v. Cotal-Crespo, 47 F,3d 1, 4-5 (1st Cir.1995); United States v. Allard, 926 F.2d 1237, 1244-45 (1st Cir.1991); see also Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(h).
Appellant was charged by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Cotal-CrespoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Raymond P. AllardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Cecilio F. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Larry Edward SteadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Medina-SilverioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Gomez-RosarioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Grispino v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Daroczi v. V T. Center for the DeafDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2004
- Bryant v. Liberty MutualDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
- Conroy's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.