Legal Opinion

Frazier v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 11, 1990No. A90A0634PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was tried before a jury and found guilty of selling cocaine. Her trial counsel filed a motion for new trial and an amended motion for new trial. These motions were denied and another attorney filed this appeal. Held:

1. In her first and third enumerations, defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.

At trial, Agent Chaneyfield of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation testified that, while working undercover in Cordele, Crisp County, Georgia, he witnessed defendant sell cocaine. This evidence was sufficient to authorize the jury’s finding that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Ivester v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Parrish v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. McGinnis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  5. Baxter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Ranson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Cheeks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  5. Carson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API