Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Miller

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 18, 1919No. 10569PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Kingfisher county; James B. Cullison, Judge. Action by James McDonald and wife against Cecelia Miller and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMeNEILL, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Kingfisher county in May, 1914, by James McDonald filing suit against Cecelia Miller and Charles Miller to cancel a certain contract entered into between James McDonald and the Millers wherein McDonald contracted to convey forty acres of land to the Millers, and for damages for wrongful detention of premises. The petition alleged the Millers had failed to comply with the terms of the contract in making certain payments due thereon, and had forfeited their rights, under the contract. Upon the trial of the case judgment was rendered in favor of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jaffrey & Co. v. McGoughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Elliott v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Foley v. HoltkampCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Illinois Life Ins. Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Sparks v. DaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kerns v. WardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. White v. MorrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  3. Williams v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Enosburg Falls Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Foster v. VickerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API