Legal Opinion
State Compensation Insurance Fund v. McConnell
California Supreme Court
Decided March 2, 1956No. S. F. 19164PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Plaintiffs (State Compensation Insurance Fund and six California insurance companies) filed an action against defendant (the California Insurance Commissioner) for declaratory relief, injunction and mandamus, to prevent a certain order changing the present system of rating workmen’s compensation insurance premiums from becoming effective.
*335Another California insurance company, Industrial Indemnity Company, intervened as plaintiff.
From a judgment sustaining the validity of the order, all plaintiffs appeal.
Questions
First: Did the defendant Insurance Commissioner have the power to promulgate and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- First Industrial Loan Co. v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Oil Well Drilling Co. v. Associated Indemnity Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1954
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Oil Well Drilling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Eastern-Columbia, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Satey v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- 20th Century Insurance v. GaramendiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Arteaga v. Brink's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- California League of Independent Insurance Producers v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1959
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.