Legal Opinion

Brainerd v. Balish

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 11, 1987No. 86-2784PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murray

Plaintiffs, Jean and Andrew Brainerd, appeal from the orders of the circuit court of Cook County dismissing their complaint based on a theory of fraud against defendants, Daniel and Carolyn Balish, for lack of in personam jurisdiction and the court’s denial of their motion for reconsideration. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

On December 12, 1985, plaintiffs filed their complaint against defendants, who are domiciled in the State of Florida and residents of the State of Pennsylvania. In their complaint, plaintiffs charged defendants with making promises in three telephone…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Green v. Advance Ross Electronics Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. R. W. Sawant & Co. v. Allied Programs Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hofner v. Glenn Ingram & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Woodfield Ford, Inc. v. Akins Ford Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. People v. MacKinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rose v. FranchettiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  2. Arthur Young & Co. v. BremerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Heil v. Morrison Knudsen Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Ideal Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Shipyard Marine, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. General Electric Credit Auto Lease, Inc. v. JankuskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API