First Natl. Bank of Green River v. Ennis
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Riner, Justice.
Appellant has filed his petition for a rehearing in this case which has been carefully examined and the record again searched in the light of the points urged therein. As a result, we conclude that the interpretation now undertaken to be put by appellant upon the evidence contained in the record is quite untenable.
The chief argument advanced at this time appears to be that the water contracts and the moneys due under them were “pledged to” Kendall, Boyer and Howell. To this, as we view the matter, there are several conclusive answers. First, no such contention has heretofore…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Watts v. LawrenceWyoming Supreme Court · 1919
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. GintherWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Allith-Prouty Co. v. WallaceWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- P & M CATTLE CO. v. HollerWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Witzenburger v. State ex rel. Wyoming Community Development AuthorityWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Mayor v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
- Walgreen Co. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1946