Legal Opinion

All-Pure Chemical Co. v. White

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1995No. 61082-7PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Utter, J. *

All-Pure Chemical Co. and All-Pure Chemical Northwest, Inc., appeal the decision of the Court of Appeals which affirmed the dismissal of All-Pure’s contribution action against Louise White, d/b/a Pools Unlimited. The Court of Appeals found that the labeling requirements of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 U.S.C. § 136, preempt state tort liability arising from a failure to warn, thereby defeating the contribution action against White. For the reasons set out below, we agree with the Court of Appeals that FI-FRA’s preemption clause expressly…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Gilbert H. Moen Co. v. Island Steel Erectors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Foust v. Estate of Walters, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  5. Stevedoring Services of America, Inc. v. EggertWashington Supreme Court · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API