Legal Opinion

Bell v. Clark

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1996No. 49S02-9608-CV-530PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

SULLIVAN, Justice.

This case requires us to rule upon the duty of a lawyer for a limited partnership to the limited partners thereof in certain circumstances.

Background

In late 1983, Gordon Clark hired attorney Richard Bell to form a limited partnership to finance the development of the Riley School Apartments. Clark was the sole general partner of the partnership. In addition to serving as the partnership’s lawyer, Bell was a limited partner, as were a number of his clients and former clients.

In April of 1985, when the Riley School Apartments were approximately 77%…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rice v. StrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bals v. VerduzcoIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Lawson v. Howmet Aluminum Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Pucci v. SantiDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  5. Wortham & Van Liew v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Durham Ex Rel. Estate of Wade v. U-Haul InternationalIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Aller v. LLaw Office of Carole C. Schriefer, PCColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Maria F. Juarez v. Menard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Associated Aviation Underwriters v. George Koch Sons, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Landeen v. PhoneBILLit, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API