Legal Opinion

State v. Queen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1968No. 39508PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Walterskirchen, J. †

This is an appeal from a conviction and sentence for indecent exposure, RCW 9.79.080. New counsel was appointed to represent appellant in this court. He makes two assignments of error: (a) that appellant was denied effective assistance of counsel, and (b) that the court erred in instructing the jury that

[I]n connection with the crime of indecent exposure, willfulness and intent are not necessary elements to constitute the offense; the mere doing of the act constitutes the crime.

Appellant’s retained trial counsel took no exception to the court’s instruction. It, therefore,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. State v. BrittonWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State v. PicheWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State v. GalbreathWashington Supreme Court · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. NgWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. NistWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  4. State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. GilmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API