Legal Opinion

Paragon, C., Corp. v. Paragon Laboratories

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 5, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant files its bill to restrain the breach of a contract.

On May 19th, 1924, the complainant entered into a contract with the defendant-corporation (which will hereinafter be called the manufacturer to distinguish it from the individual defendants). but which, upon its face, bears date the 24th of that month, wherein and whereby it was agreed, among other things, that the complainant would advertise and stimulate the sale of the manufacturer's product consisting of hair dye, and in return the manufacturer agreed to give an exclusive sales agency throughout almost the entire world to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Decorah Farmer's Cooperative SocietySupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Mandeville v. HarmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1886

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gallant v. Fashion Piece Dye WorksNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  2. Texas Co. v. Di GaetanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Cohen v. MillerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. St. John the Baptist, C., Church v. GengorNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  5. Lommason v. the Washington Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API