Commonwealth v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partNigro, Justice
I agree with the opinion announcing the judgment of the court (“opinion of judgment”) that the search of the basement exceeded the scope of the warrant for the G Service Conve*160nience Store. Unlike the opinion of judgment, however, I do not believe that the search of the basement was justified as a legitimate protective sweep and therefore, I must also respectfully dissent.
The government bears a heavy burden of proving that a warrantless search was constitutional. United States v. Jeffers, 342 U.S. 48, 51, 72 S.Ct. 93, 96 L.Ed. 59 (1951); United States v. Brightwell, 563 F.2d 569, 574 (3rd…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Commonwealth v. NorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. E.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.