United States v. Medina
U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHavranek, Judge
I agree with Judge DUIGNAN and Chief Judge McCLELLAND that Appellant’s guilty plea to consensual sodomy was improvident and that the conviction entered on the plea must be set aside. I disagree, however, that this Court may not reassess Appellant’s sentence.
Appellant pleaded guilty to and was convicted of one charge and specification of sod*656omy, in violation of Article 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), and one charge and specification of assault consummated by a battery, in violation of Article 128, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appellant to confinement for thirteen months,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. MoffeitCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.