Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Medina

U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided November 7, 2012No. CGCMG 0261Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHavranek, Judge

I agree with Judge DUIGNAN and Chief Judge McCLELLAND that Appellant’s guilty plea to consensual sodomy was improvident and that the conviction entered on the plea must be set aside. I disagree, however, that this Court may not reassess Appellant’s sentence.

Appellant pleaded guilty to and was convicted of one charge and specification of sod*656omy, in violation of Article 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), and one charge and specification of assault consummated by a battery, in violation of Article 128, UCMJ. The military judge sentenced Appellant to confinement for thirteen months,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  3. United States v. MoffeitCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  4. United States v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  5. United States v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API