Legal Opinion

O. H. Tolley & Co. v. Smith

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 4, 1916No. 9307Published

Before Wirson, J., Columbia, February, 1915. Action by O. H. Folley & Co. against W. E. Smith and J. P. Mehan as partners. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. cites: On construction of contract': 98 S. C. 3; 79 S. C. 155.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

Appellant says, in part: “This action was brought by the plaintiff-respondent against defendant-appellant to recover for certain lumber alleged to have been sold and delivered to the defendant and for certain expenses necessarily incident thereto. * * * The answer contained, first, a general denial, and also a special defense. There was a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount claimed, and, the Court declining to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial, this appeal was taken.”

1 1. “Exception No. 1…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fairly v. Wappoo MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  2. Cousar v. Heath, Witherspoon & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API