Legal Opinion

De Witt v. Medley

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 11, 1990No. 18101PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

This case involves interpretation of the forerunner to Idaho’s Wage and Hour Law, I.C. §§ 45-601 to -617, formerly called the Idaho Claims for Wages Statutes. 1 Two issues are presented on appeal: (1) whether the thirty-day wage penalty contemplated in I.C. § 45-606 2 applies to employees who are paid for piece work; and (2) whether a party who successfully obtains a judgment under the Wage and Hour Law may be entitled to prejudgment interest. In this case, a magistrate found that the appellants were entitled to neither form of relief. On appeal, the district court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cole v. KunzlerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Lawless v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. ReedIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. State v. BreedIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. CantrellIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  2. Roberts v. WymanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Roberts v. WymanIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Sanchez v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Sanchez v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API