Legal Opinion

Frazier v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1979No. 58935, 58936PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Chief Judge.

Technically, both appeals of this defendant from a conviction for rape are untimely. One, a pro se, appears on its face to have been filed more than a month after the verdict and judgment, although its date is prior thereto. No motion for new trial is recited. The other, wherein the defendant is represented by counsel, was filed 32 days after the overruling of a motion for new trial. In an effort to make sure, however, that no miscarriage of justice has occurred, we have examined the record and make the following findings:

1. "A jury in arriving at a conclusion upon disputed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sappington v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Deese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Echols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Banks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  2. Kilgore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Gamble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API