Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 18, 1962No. 39388PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Franicum, Judge.

Movant contends that the jury’s verdict should be set aside because the evidence demanded a conviction of murder or acquittal and that the law of imvoluntary manslaughter was not involved in the case.

The defendant, in her statement to the jury, said: “Of course I didn’t give him this stuff to kill him. I didn’t give it to him. I put it in the car—just a tiny bit. It might make him sick where he would quit drinking whisky so I could stay in the house.” And, “I sure didn’t mean to hurt him, but I sure meant to make him sick.” It is obvious that when the defendant referred to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Myrick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  3. May v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  4. Hargroves v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Partee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Bennett MaselCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  2. State v. WeaverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Ramey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API