Harris v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Franicum, Judge.
Movant contends that the jury’s verdict should be set aside because the evidence demanded a conviction of murder or acquittal and that the law of imvoluntary manslaughter was not involved in the case.
The defendant, in her statement to the jury, said: “Of course I didn’t give him this stuff to kill him. I didn’t give it to him. I put it in the car—just a tiny bit. It might make him sick where he would quit drinking whisky so I could stay in the house.” And, “I sure didn’t mean to hurt him, but I sure meant to make him sick.” It is obvious that when the defendant referred to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Myrick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- May v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Hargroves v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Partee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Bennett MaselCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- State v. WeaverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Ramey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992