Legal Opinion

Buenger v. Pruden

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1986No. 85-176PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Justice.

Through appeal by the purchaser, we consider the effect of F.O.B.-destination on the seller’s responsibility for freight costs, and reverse the trial-court decision charging the buyer.

The issues raised by the appeal are the F.O.B.-destination effect on freight costs and prejudgment interest charged if a contested nonliquidated claim is involved in the litigation.

Appellant Robert L. Buenger (Buenger) entered into detailed purchase documents with appellee Vareo Pruden, to purchase certain buildings for erection at jobsite by shipment from Evansville, Wisconsin, to Gillette,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Droukas v. Divers Training Academy, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Rissler & McMurry Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Foote's Dixie Dandy, Inc. v. McHenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Sheffield Furnace Co. v. Hull Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. State Highway Commission v. Brasel & Sims Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bueno v. CF & I STEEL CORP.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. BUEHNER BLOCK COMPANY, INC. v. Wyoming Dept. of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API