Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Henson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 1, 1963No. 1 Div. 103PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.

This is a statutory action in the nature of ejectment. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

The controversy is over the SW54" of the SEj4 °f Section 17, Township 8 North, Range 1 West, in Washington County, Ala-hama. •

This' is the second appeal in this case. See Reynolds v. Henson, 268 Ala. 239, 105 So.2d 679.

Rule 9 of the Revised Rules of the Supreme Court of' Alabama, effective June 1, 1955, 261 Ala. XIX, reads:

“Appellant’s brief under separate .headings shall contain: (a) under the heading ‘Statement of the Case,’ a concise statement of so…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Suits v. GloverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Boles v. BonnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  4. Schneider v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Shelby County v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Union Oil Company of California v. CraneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Piper Ice Cream Company v. Midwest Dairy Prod. Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  4. Zanaty v. HagertySupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  5. Reynolds v. HensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API