Reynolds v. Henson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.
This is a statutory action in the nature of ejectment. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
The controversy is over the SW54" of the SEj4 °f Section 17, Township 8 North, Range 1 West, in Washington County, Ala-hama. •
This' is the second appeal in this case. See Reynolds v. Henson, 268 Ala. 239, 105 So.2d 679.
Rule 9 of the Revised Rules of the Supreme Court of' Alabama, effective June 1, 1955, 261 Ala. XIX, reads:
“Appellant’s brief under separate .headings shall contain: (a) under the heading ‘Statement of the Case,’ a concise statement of so…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. HollandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Suits v. GloverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Boles v. BonnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Schneider v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Shelby County v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ex Parte RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Union Oil Company of California v. CraneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Piper Ice Cream Company v. Midwest Dairy Prod. Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Zanaty v. HagertySupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Reynolds v. HensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.