Legal Opinion
Huard v. Maine State Retirement System
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 8, 1989PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKUSICK, Chief Justice.
Leon Huard and James Dyke retired in 1987 from their positions as junior high school teachers in School Administrative District No. 54 in the Skowhegan area. Their retirement pensions as members of the Maine State Retirement System (MSRS) are set by state statute at a percentage of their "earnable compensation” averaged over their three highest-paid years of participating employment, typically the last three years. See 5 M.R.S.A. §§ 17001(4)(A), 17852(1)(A) (1989). Retirement payments for teachers are funded partly by teacher contributions of a prescribed percentage of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ashby v. Rust Engineering Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Soucy v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF STATE RET. SYSTEMSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. State Tax AssessorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- State v. Maine State Employees Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
3Cited by10 opinions
- Spiller v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Imagineering, Inc. v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Berry v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, RETIREMENT SYS.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- MAINE AFL-CIO v. Superintendent of Ins.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Kelley v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.