Clay v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LAURA CARTER HIGLEY, Justice.
A jury found appellant, Willie Allen Clay, guilty of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment at 60 years’ confinement and a $10,000 fine. In one issue, appellant contends that the trial court’s admission into evidence of his accomplices’ statements to police violated his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation. Since appellant’s trial, the United States Supreme Court held in Crawford v. Washington that testimonial statements, such as the ones at issue in this case, are inadmissible. Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 68, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 1374, 158…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clay v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Clay, Willie AllenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007