Legal Opinion

Smith v. . Frazier

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Civil aotioN, heard, before Coble, J'., at- January Term, 1896, of GbaNville Superior Court. The facts appear in the opinion of the Chief Justice.

1Opinion of the Court

Eairoloth, C. J.:

The object of this action was to foreclose a bond for title to land purchased by the defendants, and for a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the balance of the purchase-money. At July Term, 1895, the cause was tried, and the plaintiff recovered judgment and the land was ordered to be sold by two commissioners then appointed, with a further order that the proceeds be applied first to the cost and expenses of the sale, including five per cent, commissions on the sale, and the balance in payment of the judgment. Accordingly, the commissioners advertised to sell the land,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dawson v. . GrafflinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Pass v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Turner v. . BogerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  2. Pringle v. Winston-Salem Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. In Re Sale of E. Hollowell Land Ex Rel. Southern Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Silverboard v. IteldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API