Legal Opinion

United States v. Mayhew

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 5, 2005No. 2:03-cv-00165PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS IN LI-MINE TO EXCLUDE WRITTEN AND ORAL STATEMENTS

MARBLEY, District Judge.

I.INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motions in Limine to Exclude Kristina McKibben’s Oral Statement, Kristina McKibben’s Written Statements Made On or After August 7, 2003, and Kristina McKibben’s Written Statements Made Before August 7, 2003. For the reasons stated herein, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Kristina McKibben’s Oral Statement [Docket No. 39]; the Court GRANTS in part and finds MOOT in part Defendant’s Motion in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Tennessee v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. People v. StechlyIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Leon Davis, Jr. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  4. People v. GilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API