Legal Opinion

Reiner v. Reiner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 1984PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a matrimonial action for divorce and other relief in which the summons and complaint were amended, on consent, to include a cause of action to impress a constructive trust, naming the defendant husband’s parents as codefendants, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her notice of appeal and brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Schneier, J.), *873dated June 7, 1983, as (1) denied her application to impress a constructive trust upon one half of the proceeds from the sale of the marital premises and ordered that the other half of the proceeds, $36,981.71,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sharp v. KosmalskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Brescia v. FittsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Simonds v. SimondsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Sinclair v. . PurdyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. In Re: Koreag, Controle Et Revision S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. William Wrigley Jr. Co. v. WatersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. Josephine Counihan, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. Gray v. Fill (In Re Fill)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  5. United States v. RivieccioDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1987

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API