Legal Opinion

Stinson v. Stinson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 5, 2012No. 2011-CA-001312-MRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAMBERT, Judge:

Stephen Ray Stinson appeals from the order of the Barren Family Court holding him in contempt of an amended domestic violence order (DVO) for violating the no contact or communication provision. He contends that the family court erred in entering the original DVO in 2009 and that he could not be found in contempt of the amended DVO because he had never been served with it. Because we agree that a party may not be held in contempt for violating an order with which he was not served, we must reverse the contempt order.

Stephen and Tracy Lynn Stinson were formerly married…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SmithKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Stewart v. Kentucky Lottery Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1999
  3. United Tobacco Warehouse, Inc. v. Southern States Frankfort Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anglin v. Justice & Public Safety CabinetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2015
  2. Erwin v. CruzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2014
  3. Jason Imholt v. Haley HotchkissCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API