Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Rose

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 28, 1996No. CA 95-37PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wendell L. Griffen, Judge.

State Farm Insurance Company has appealed the judgment of the Circuit Court of Garland County denying its post-trial motion for a set-off against a $45,000 jury verdict rendered in favor of David Rose, State Farm’s insured under a policy providing underinsured motorist (“UIM”) coverage. Rose was injured when a driver insured by another insurance company side-swiped his vehicle on July 19, 1991. The insurer for the tortfeasor paid $25,000, the limits under its liability coverage, and Rose then sued State Farm under his UIM coverage claiming damages totalling $95,000.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shelter Mutual Insurance v. BoughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Amos v. StroudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Younts v. Baldor Elec. Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Adams Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Gause v. Shelter General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API