Legal Opinion

Corneil v. New Era Lumber Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1888PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Oceana. (Bussell, J.) Asstmpsit on logging contract. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant to recover tbe compensation agreed to be paid him for cutting and delivering logs under a written contract originally made by defendant with plaintiff and his partner, Angus Mackintosh. By this agreement Corneil and Mackintosh agreed, under certain restrictions and regulations not necessary to be described, to cut and deliver at the mill named, in board and strip, logs, the timber on certain *353lands described. The work was to be paid for on terms the meaning of which is disputed. The provision was as follows :

“At the rate of three dollars and seventy-five cents per…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barnes v. LeidighOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Gordon v. Cleveland Sawmill & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API