Legal Opinion
United Steelworkers of America v. Reliance Universal Inc. Of Ohio
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 8, 1964No. 14834_1PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
The matter in dispute on this appeal is whether a purchaser of an industrial plant who has continued the operation substantially unchanged is free to> impose terms and conditions of employment in disregard of the collective bargaining agreement which was in force-between the seller and the union representing the plant’s employees at the time-of the sale.
Prior to September 1963, Martin Marietta Corporation owned and operated a. concrete pipe plant in Bridgeville, Pennsylvania. For many years the appellant, union, United Steelworkers of America,, had been the exclusive…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
3Cited by50 opinions
- United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. United States Gypsum Company, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Rodríguez Oquendo v. Petrie Retail Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2006
- United States Gypsum Company v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Bruno López v. Motorplan, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1993
- Monroe Sander Corp. v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.