Legal Opinion

B & H Associates v. Buscemi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover a real estate brokerage commission, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), dated May 25, 1995, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs

"It is well established that, in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, a real estate broker will be deemed to have earned his commission when he produces a purchaser who is *457ready, willing and able to purchase at the seller’s terms” (Henri-Lynn Realty v Huang, 159 AD2d 486; see, Rusciano Realty Servs. v Griffler, 62 NY2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rusciano Realty Services, Ltd. v. GrifflerNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Henri-Lynn Realty, Inc. v. HuangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sutton & Edwards, Inc. v. 68-60 Austin Street Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. R.R. Ragette, Inc. v. D'InceccoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Moore & Moore Real Estate v. AloiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Syragakis v. Majestic AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API