Legal Opinion

Gill v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 8, 1992No. 89C12469; CA A65889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendants appeal and plaintiffs cross-appeal a judgment for indemnification under ORS 30.285(1). We reverse on the appeal and affirm on the cross-appeal.

The individual defendants are current or former directors of SAIF. In 1987, they brought an action against plaintiffs, who were SAIF’s employees, and others. The circuit court granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs then filed this action, seeking indemnification for attorney fees and costs incurred in defending against defendants’ action. The trial court granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Fire Insurance v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Oregon Health Sciences UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Montgomery Elevator Co. v. Tuality Community Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State Ex Rel. State Accident Insurance Fund v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gill v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API