Legal Opinion
Kersting v. United States
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided July 8, 1994No. Civ. 90-00304 HMF, 91-00747 HMF and 92-00593 HMFPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND MOTION TO STRIKE
FONG, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On June 15, 1994, the court heard arguments on several motions brought by plaintiffs Henry Kersting and thirty-three corporations (“plaintiffs”). On May 19, 1994, plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the court’s previous order, delivered from the bench on May 17, 1994, denying plaintiffs’ “motion to disclose extent of invasion of attorney-client relationship and to prohibit use of evidence.” The court hereby delivers its rulings on plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of the following…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Nissho-Iwai American Corporation v. R. Sukarno Kline, Individually and D/B/A Frankenburg Import-Export Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cortez v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Hainey v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Crain v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Pieszak v. Glendale Adventist Medical CenterDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
- Matsuda v. WadaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.